-
THIS IS ONE GREAT LENS ,VERY SHARP WITH GOOD CONTRAST ,FUN TO USE AND GREAT
-
Amazing color, contrast, and sharp
-
Contrast is very good
-
Contrast and color with this lens is excellent.
-
But for the price it has excellent IQ and color contrast.
-
Pro: excellent picture quality, great picture contrast, smooth focusing motors, excellent glass quality
-
Pros:- Among the very best build quality.- Excellent, buttery smooth, super fast front-focus system.- Top notch color and contrast
-
which this lens delivers- contrast is great, color is
-
I continue to be impressed with the sharp high contrast photos and the super fast auto focus
-
I have the 5Dm2 and this is my first L-series lens (I couldn't afford the 24-105 when I bought the body), and boy is it great!I love the realistic skin tones, high contrast, and amazing color
-
the contrast and sharpness are great, it is relatively fast and extremely reliable, the success rate with this lens is excellent
-
As one would expect from L-series glass, clear with good contrast and color
-
Contrast was very good and I couldn't tell any difference between the two lenses
-
Those other lenses are pretty good, but just can't quite match the wonderful color, contrast and sharpness of the 17-40 across its range.
-
The contrast and colors are vibrant and it's sharp from edge to edge wide open
-
This lens does a fine job, but I did notice that when I took picures of builings with words or other features that had good straight-lined contrast, the sharpness was exceptional
-
Colours are rich and vibrant, and the contrast is great
-
Also between 35-40mm, the lens' transmitted contrast degrades very fast (look at the MTF charts on canon's website)
-
The great contrast this lens produces (blacker blacks, richer colors), and the especially flat field of view are the frosting on the cake to make this a great option for landscape shooters demanding a great lens.4 stars for the crummy performance at f/4 and at 17mm.
-
Great lens for the beginner as well as for the seasoned pro
-
While it is reasonably sharp at f4 across the focal range, it is not as sharp as when stopped down to f5.6.
-
It's as sharp as or slightly sharper than the 24-105 f4
-
This lens is nowhere near as sharp as the Canon 50
-
Not sure if this is normal on an APS-C camera or not, but I'm a little mystified as to how this is happening!
-
It's just does not have the 'hoopla' of lenses like the 70-200mm, but as good as that is for telephoto, this is superb for wide angle
-
But sharpens up a lot in the corners by going to F/4.5 and is as sharp as it's going to get by around F/8 where it seems about as sharp as any zoom I have and is approaching the sharpness of a prime lens at 17mm
-
The pictures were nowhere near as sharp as I had hoped for (Although I had no illusions that every picture would be tack sharp just because I got a new fancy lens.
-
Nowhere near as sharp as you'd expect from an L lens
-
I'm still reviewing, but my initial thoughts are the focus isn't quite as sharp as it could be?
-
I use it to shoot from an elevated angle as well as for interior photos.