-
With a new baby on the way, I wanted a lens that would allow me to take razor-sharp images of my new bundle of joy while blurring the background and surrounding parts of the image("bokeh").
-
Nice images at f1.2
-
Using this lens at 1.2 is amazing; it allows you to really hone in on a certain subject which makes the image really strong and powerful; not to mention, delicious creamy bokeh and super sharpness
-
Most of the time I use the lens at either 2.0 or 2.2, and images at those apertures are super colorful and sharp (much more so than the 50 1.4)
-
It is a heavy, hardy beast and I have gotten superior images out of it that have been included in numerous publications and websites
-
Shooting at f1.2 produces very good images, but very shallow depth of field, so be careful with recomposing shots.
-
It's simply not there - no comparison except for focal length...from my perspective this tool produces a superior image rendering that is de-mon-stra-tive of professional image output
-
Near minimum focusing distance (much closer than what you would use for portraits), images are not as sharp
-
The images I get with this lens wide open are breathtaking
-
I've quizzed several owners of this lens and found that they either shoot above f/2 to get sharp images, or they simply write the problem off as "softness" when something is out-of-focus.
-
Very clear images, totally worth the investment!
-
Update with Full Frame:For over 15 months I've been using this lens with a full frame body as well, excellent results, sharp wide open and professional image rendering!
-
The images that I've gotten so far are all the reassurance that I need that this lens is well-worth the investment.
-
(7D)+ Silent USM motor+ Beautiful images even at f/1.2+ The perfect baby/infant
-
Some says you get sharper images on certain stops with 1.4 but sharpness is not everything about image quality
-
With a new baby on the way, I wanted a lens that would allow me to take razor-sharp images of my new bundle of joy while blurring the background and surrounding parts of the image("bokeh").
-
Finally I think I learned to use this Lens to get sharp images, after a lot of trial and error!!
-
Might not be as sharp wide open, but still makes images look nicer, a special feel, than any lens i owned
-
With every picture I take with this lens, the images seem to be improving though.
-
But after seeing the comparison shots, I am debating whether or not to sell the 1.4, as it has bitingly sharp images, especially from f/2.8 and above
-
Other professionals have already waxed eloquent on the superb image quality of this lens, and I am in 100% agreement
-
This lens produces superb image quality and is lightweight.
-
Wanted a prime lens -- to reground myself with the basics (no zooming); with a wide aperture for natural light; having great glass for excellent images; ability to use for portraits and with the potential as a walk around lens
-
Don't kid yourself - you can't take razor sharp images at f/1.2 because of spherical aberation, but you can take
-
I have had no focusing issues with my copy, purchased in August 2009.Overall better image quality than the 1.4
-
Beautiful images come from this lens, it’s now my favorite which is saying a lot since I love the Canon 85mm 1.2
-
If you demand the best image output for your photography this is the lens for you
-
Both produces good images and both feels cheap
-
In harshly backlit environments, the 50/1.2 L delivers vastly superior image quality than the other 50s.- Build quality is top notch - typical of Canon "L" lenses
-
At f/1.2 you can get extremely shallow DoF but tack sharp images where you need it the most
-
If you focus with that on the eye and then recompose your shot you will get super sharp images perfectly focused.
-
I have very rarely shot someone at 1.2, or even at 1.4, but if you have a very high resolution camera that can get a lot of detail from a person who is far away, then you can shoot at 1.2 and capture the entire body with razor sharp image quality.
-
More expensive than the Canon lens, but slightly better image quality wide open
-
Please keep in mind that soft images do NOT mean the lens is soft
-
This lens produces some really stunning images.
-
It is sort of sharp at f/1.2, but it is not as sharp as it is at 2.8
-
The 50 f/1.4 then takes over in sharpness at around f/2.2 to f/2.8.The 50L 1.2 will never be as sharp as my 85L 1.2 II.