At f/16 diffraction starts to cause some very slight softness in image quality when the image is viewed at 100%.I would definitely recommend this lens to someone who is looking for a good wide angle solution for a full frame camera and doesn't need the extra 2mm on the wide end, the constant f/2.8 aperture or the extra weight of the Nikon 14-24

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM (bought this one on Amazon).Looking to add another camera body - probably in FX format - in the near future so looking for an FX compatible wide angle to complete my arsenal

The reason I mention the above is because after much field use, the 16-35 is the best and most practical wide angle in terms of weight, option for filter use and ruggedness

love the wide angle of the lens and image quality

The 14-24mm is an exemplary wide-angle lens and remains unmatched till this day.

This lens is an affordable ultra wide angle for full frame, given its semi-pro build and quality, that

I love the angle of view I am able to capture with this lens.

Bad distortion and not even sharp by f8 or f9.I've used many wide angles thru the years,primes and zooms for Canon,Sony,Nikon and Fuji and sadly,all this

It gives me that wide angle on my full frame camera that I need, sharp, sharp and sharp.

it works a