Both are great lenses!

(The manual focus ring, for example, is as smooth as lenses that are much, much more expensive, and certainly smoother than most Olympus lenses I've used.

I swapped to my other Sony E-Mount lenses and they worked just fine.

And of course, my subject choice has changed away from wildlife to urban shooting which I believe these new lenses are worth a try.

It is clearly far better in every way, except that last little bit of wideness, than the Sony 16 and I do not think using even exotic and vastly more expensive lenses will result in a noticeably superior image (although I would use them if I had them!).On a Nex this is a 28mm lens, not terribly wide but very useful for those of use who do not get into the extreme wide angles

Those old lenses are pretty impressive.

I was unsure if it would work for the IR camera as many lenses have a hot spot in the center of the frame when used for IR

Good lense, good bokeh and wide enough.

I've tried several APS-C Sigma lenses as well as OEM Sony lenses

I'm just going to stick with Sony lenses and also adapting classic lenses

Certainly cheaper, although not as exciting, than making perfect $6000 lenses to fit on more basic cameras

Well, I feel kind of silly writing a review for an item that already has over 200 reviews, and almost a straight five-star rating, but I have to say that this is one of the most impressive lenses I've used on the micro 4/3 format cameras

I thought the lenses were defective, so I returned them

My lens tests are pretty much backyard comparisons, but clearly this lens is sharp and it carries its acuity quite a ways out from the center, where all lenses are pretty good these days

It is easier for a tech giant like Sony to put ever increasing computer capabilities in their cameras in order to allow for good results from relatively affordable lenses