If you have a smart phone that takes good pictures (and most do nowadays), this camera is a useless bauble

For that, a smart phone fits the bill

To sum up: not the best of its kind, and its kind has been turfed out by smart phone technology

The pics are pretty good, but not as good as your phone pics.

I do have a smart phone that takes good pictures, but I don't always want to use the phone for multiple shots at family style events.

Overall it fits neatly in a pocket and unless you rely solely upon you smart phone this is a well priced option for quality pictures in general.

This model is very small and almost as thin as my smart phone

This camera was just as good as any smart phone.

A higher-priced smart phone would probably take better pics, but I like Sony and their products, so I'll probably stick with this.

The video quality is more than sufficient and seems just as good, if not better than most smart phones

Nowadays smart phone cameras are so good, I question the need to spend $140 on a little pocket camera like this

I like using a digital camera for events or places where i dont like to take my phone out, but i guess ill still be taking my pictures on my crappy little samsung phone

In practice, the definition of the camera image is so poor that a good phone with digital zoom beats it.

my phone is better

But . . . the reality is that there is little point now in a low cost camera if you have a decent phone

Everyone should have one of these if they don't have a smart phone camera.

So, if you have a nice smart phone, this camera won't offer much additional.

I have a dslr, but wanted something smaller and comparable to a smart phone when it comes to quality and portability