Cause this game is for the people who love the characters they play as; people who feel for them and care for them as they pass through the different stages of the game.

rich characters background and backstory- story is crafted superbly- fantastic dungeons- good turn-based battle system- western and fantasy merge very well- too much

There are a few memorable side characters here and there too.

They are all decent enough characters who have some sort of personality, and much to the game's credit, they all have some sort of backstory and character development to them.

overall).What really made Wild ARMS such a strong game is the excellent character development that easily rivals ANY square-enix title (I'm not afraid to make such a bold statement!)

overall).What really made Wild ARMS such a strong game is the excellent character development that easily rivals ANY square-enix title (I'm not afraid to make such a bold statement!)

.... and so the character lack life- snes 2D graphics and ugly

The story was fairly interesting and the minor characters were fun to see pop up from time to time.

Well, this game has three main characters, and that's it.

The game has great character development

Um, the game looks pretty simplistic for a PS1 game, with very simplistic 3-D character models and flat backgrounds that look like they could've come from an early Final Fantasy.

However, in spite of this format, Wild Arms delivers on plenty of plot twists and character development

Sure, but these characters are just fine, especially for an older game.

The only downsides I can think of are the bad-as-of-now graphics

Even FFVII, as great as it may be, ultimately fell for the same format

The only downsides I can think of are the bad-as-of-now graphics

Even FFVII, as great as it may be, ultimately fell for the same format