This made me doubt the quality of capture

The scanning process is quite easy, but the quality of the scans is very poor

Wolverine some for reason produces much better image quality

F2D-Super"1. cheaply made, the physical quality of the box and the unit itself is cheap

For decent quality images, it takes about 30-60s to scan a strip (5-6 photos) of film; whereas with the wolverine it takes 1 second to scan 1 photo

The better quality of the scans is worth it.

Good image quality

Price is not bad; it does the job but the quality is not as good as I'd hoped.

Slow process but OK quality

The simple math says that's about 30hrs of work for one reel which is a small price for a good image quality...if only this were good image quality

Poor quality!

But the quality of the scanned pictures was terrible and I could not find a way around that

Quality of pictures are very poor.

I am now moving towards the Epson flatbed photo scanners V600, V800 since these allow much better quality and the scanners can also scan multiple slides/negatives, photo prints (like my fading Wedding photos) and documents so it will provide much more functionality even though it is more money.

It's quick and the quality isn't terrible-great if you have a lot of film to archive

Once I figured out that trick, my scan quality improved

However, the quality is simply terrible

And it’s good enough quality to share your pictures with friends and family without feeling ashamed

The quality of the pictures is also pretty good

The quality of the scans are great.

Quality of the created files was great.

If I want super quality, I will use my Epson flatbed scanner on a few slides, but for my money, this is a great little tool and I'd recommend it to anyone wanting to digitize old slides or negatives.

Slides are slower since you have to use a tray and the quality is not as good as negatives.

I do wish buttons had a better quality feel, but that's just bring picky

DSLR negative scanning (check youtube) produces much better quality results although requires a decent amount of processing

If I was scanning the printed photo I would be ok, but since I am scanning a negative, I was expecting lot better quality and noise

While this device makes transferring slides to digital format relatively simple and quick (the push-through tray is much better than the standard 3-slide holders, though thicker slides are difficult to push), the quality of capture is mediocre

It is faster to scan 35 mm slides and the quality is much better

mmdoes slides easily and with good quality,butis very difficult loading negatives without putting fingerprints on them.would not recommend it because of this problem

The quality of image captured by this device is very inferior to that of the scanner so for $79 more I have a much better quality image and all the versatility of a full scanner.

Quality of the pictures is good.

but there was way too much pixelation, noisy, and not very good image quality.

I was able to process about 300 various size negatives into very good digital quality pictures in about 2 hours using this product!

Amazing quality results for surprising little investment to save the images.

I'm sure you can get better quality from another brand, but this does the job, is easy to use, and was not that expensive.

The quality of the scans were better than I expected.

Good quality of the images for the money

I also found that giving each slide about 30 seconds to "focus" before pressing the "Convert" button results in a better quality reproduction

The product is what was ordered, but the only thing I see in improvements is to make the viewing larger, some negatives are small, and unfortunately some are not good quality, otherwise its great.

The quality of these was still bad and not useful for saving family memories :

My flatbed scanner returns far better quality scans, but is a ton slower (and handles only 35mm negatives).Every last image needed some tweaking and cleanup in Photoshop, as they all had a green color caste and every little scratch and speck of dust came through

Quality is "good enough", but the speed and ease of use is what really wins

I expected a much better scan quality

The wolverine processed each slide in 2 or 3 seconds and created high resolution images of impressive quality

I have scanned hundreds of slides and given disks to various family members who all comment on the wonderful quality of the pictures.

Can anyone suggest a good quality affordable scanner that will do what this product advertises

Quality is similar to digital photos, but only a little grainy when seen at 1:1

Good quality and easy to use.

The quality is very good, better than the prints I got when I got the film developed.

Pros: easy to use and few clicksCons: lot of noise bad quality of scan, cannot adjust resolution, cannot adjust date, cheaply

The files are indeed 20MP and the quality is good, definitely better than what I was getting with my old flatbed scanner, and definitely enough to make my parents happy

The quality of the pictures is quite impressive.

Easy to use with a good quality image.

Easy to use and does a great job with both slides and negatives, significantly improving the quality of photos I had previously scanned with a flat bed scanner with a slide and negative attachment.

It's so nice to have a device that will produce better quality images than the original prints that were made

If you need to convert your old slides to good quality images, do not buy this product, go for a real slide scanner for just a few more dollars.

I had prints made after the transfer and the quality was pretty good for the age of the original slides

I wanted something that would make good-quality scans of the slides, but would be simple to use, because Mom is sometimes intimidated by unfamiliar technology.

The quality of image captured by this device is very inferior to that of the scanner so for $79 more I have a much better quality image and all the versatility of a full scanner.

This unit is what I would call a handy way to scan a lot of slides quickly at good enough quality to share with others

Easy to use, very good quality scans, apparently quite durable.

The pictures produced by the Wolverine are of very poor quality and not even clear.

I don't know what cork up the butt is talking about when he mentioned mediocre quality because I'm getting top notch saves

I bought it to scan slides and negatives because I believed I could get better quality images from these image sources rather than 6x4 photos for which I use a sheet feed photo scanner

The quality of the images was good.

The time it's going to cost you to fix each negative scanned with the wolverine, it would be faster to scan the developed photo on a quality flat top scanner

I don't know if it is possible a better quality from a film (negative) or even from a standard scan from the hardcopy photo, but I understand from the reviews the quality was better

In conclusion, I would say try this little gizmo, even if your original slides are not of the best quality.

Excellent quality & ease of use

Excellent quality & ease of use

I think the qualities of the originals were better than the copies but I am not a perfectionist and am happy with the results

I was thinking about buying a better flatbed, but I already have a handheld 1200dpi scanner for larger files (mainly for business use though, as is the case with my Officejet scanner), so this was certainly more of an economical option!The Quality of the photos once scanned was very good, I saw detail that wasn't even there on the 4x6 prints they were initially developed to!I noticed a lot of people were complaining about the dust factor; well this is (more or less) an issue on every film to digital scanner (unless you spend a lot of money on a professional one), and my fix was to use compressed air cartridges (these are available at any electronics retailer) and this did the

Very good quality digital files, and very easy transfer (although laborious)

It's quick and the quality isn't terrible-great if you have a lot of film to archive

Projection/capture is by far the fastest method too, so until someone creates home telecine hardware/software that produces good quality at a decent price I'm sticking with what works

I am now moving towards the Epson flatbed photo scanners V600, V800 since these allow much better quality and the scanners can also scan multiple slides/negatives, photo prints (like my fading Wedding photos) and documents so it will provide much more functionality even though it is more money.

The pictures I have are a better quality than the converted negatives.

The Epson 550 does a superb job, but its too time cumbersome for editing out poor quality junk

Here is a wish list if they produce a new version in the future:- come with a descent lens to produce better quality images, even with double price.- have a VGA or other monitor output to preview the image on a large monitor in addition to the stamp size screen for accurate level and color adjustment

Unfortunately, the smaller the negative gets, the worse the picture quality.

The Wolverine has proved to be a great compromise - it doesn't scan to TIFF or RAW (or it would have got 5 stars!), and doesn't offer the massive resolutions possible on flatbed scanners, but the quality is still very good, and more than meets our requirements - crucially, we are able to scan, label, and catalogue around 600 slides or negatives per day, far more than would have been possible using our flatbed scanners or even a batch-feeding scanner

Quality is fine.

The quality of the results are fantastic and I would highly recommend this product especially as opposed to paying someone to do it.

but for the price the device did exactly what it said it would do - produced a decent quality digital copy from the slide.

In comparison to standard flat film scanners the device is simple, ready for use and much quicker and for the price the quality of scans is great

Quality of digital image is not as good as I expected nor easy to make adjustments

FAST AND QUALITY IS GOOD.

It's quick, decent quality digital images for the price of the device

The quality of the digital files is very good, and I'm happy with the output, but it's not advertised to be, and is not, a professional product.

Scan times are very quick like about 10 seconds and scanned image is very good quality.

Poor vision quality on the devices screen

But surprising it produces good quality images.

Nice quality scans

The quality is great and the process is simple

but when I powered it up and put my film in to scan, the quality was horrible.

After reading reviews I was concerned that I wouldn't be happy with the resolution, I find that the resolution to be similar to that of a good quality digital camera.

Once you use it a few times you'll find its really easy to use and fast - does a nice quality JPG of the negatives and slides

I definitely recommend this if you're not looking for top quality scans.

So very good throughput and excellent quality of final images.

I saw comparisons before buying this converter and the conclusion is that this is a very fast and good quality converter

I purchased this scanner based on the numerous positive reviews but am returning it because I found the quality of the scans to be poor.

Quality of scanned picture and color is bad and beyond adjustment

varying cardboard thicknesses require an extra nudge to pass through the channel, but overall the F2D Super delivers a very good digital image quality given the decades old technology sources.

So basically the end results is as good as the quality of the slide and my dad's focusing and picture taking skills back then.

Great concept, but the quality of the product we could produce at home was very poor

Those slides had a cartoonish quality to them

The slides sometimes get jammed in the feeder and the quality was not super but it got the job done for a reasonable price.

The scan quality is simply poor, and there is not much dynamic range

Good quality image and nicely stored on the sd card.

they look ok, but poor quality finished product.

I have boxes of old negs' in sleeves that I have had to go through to get rid of the poor quality "out-takes"

Now i have all my 35mm photos in digital, with a good quality for a good price

the scan quality is VERY poor

I should add, the quality is great, but not professional grade, however, it does allow you to pick out the slides you wish to have professionally processed.

While easy to use, the quality of the scans are poor to bad.

While easy to use, the quality of the scans are poor to bad.

Quality is good, slides seem to be better than film but of course a lot has to do with the original photo quality.

Granted the time to scan photos using the wolverine is much faster that using a flat top scanner, the quality is very poor in comparison.

Quality was nice on the big screen

Was expecting better quality for $100.00.

Tedious process with poor quality results

So quality is not good at all.

I had hoped that the 20MP resolution of the unit would produce a high-enough quality image for me to work with.

I have read other reviews that have mentioned the quality wasn't as good as they thought it might be.

Very poor image quality and color translation, no consistency between scans, remedial editing tools that border on useless.

Plus the quality of the scans is good enough to enlarge or print

In addition to the bad quality I found it very difficult to push some slides through

Just a few minutes of work, after a few photos of the conversion, the colors are mixed and made ​​a very poor quality photos

Quality of pictures isn't great, but at least they are now digitized.

On the picture it looks like more bigger, but in reality is small, the screen is small to and have not good quality

’s 20 slides).Make sure there aren’t any particles or specks of dust or lint inside of the machine and on the scanning lens as well as on your slides or they will show up on every slide scanned

It really works as it says it does!!

The first one I tried was not great and reinforced my concern but decided to keep on going as I had hundreds of slides, so after a few I saw some were as clear as if they had been taken today with a digital camera.

The images produced by the Wolverine were every bit as good as those turned out by the Nikon

The color on older slides cannot be adjusted as well as I liked