• Reviews around result (4.19 of 5)

    Wolverine F2D Super 20MP 4-In-1 Film to Digital Converter

    • Very good results.
    • Good DIY results for the price.
    • And grainy results.
    • Beautiful results, very crisp images
    • Transferred all my Family Slides to digital with pretty good results especially since the slides were quite old.
    • Follow the instructions and you should have great results
    • This little gem performs flawlessly and gives incredible results
    • I have tried the 35mm negative converter feature as well, and the results are excellent!I would like to publicly thank Matt for his quick response in resolving my issue, and given the excellent support, I will not hesitate to buy from Wolverine again in the near future
    • If this process sounds tedious, that's because it is, but the results this unit yields in the process are great.
    • It is simple to use, very fast and the results are excellent.
    • I gave it five stars because I feel you get a good result for your money
    • All of them resulted in an horrific resulting photo.
    • Totally outstanding results.
    • I even tried scanning some 8mm movie film from the 60's with good results
    • Depending on the age of the negatives, the results were decent
    • Easy to use, Good results.
    • Getting scans of the negatives was also simple, fast and delivered amazing results.
    • so I would not expect good results for this
    • Even if you do not enhance them with a photo edit, the results are good.
    • You easily slide negatives thru the supplied guide with outstanding results
    • This unit works as good as having them done by a pro as I had about 100 done and I think you will get as good or even better results with this
    • I did put the SD card into my computer and the results are great
    • I've only tried scanning 35mm slides with this scanner as of this writing and the results are terrible
    • This scanner is very easy to use and gives excellent results.
    • It is easy to use and produces good results.
    • I had just inherited 60 year old slides from my husbands family and was hoping this would make the transfer from slides to digital go so much faster and give better results than the 5 megapixel I had
    • It seems to, that no cheap slide/film scanner, that works as a camera, essentially, can produce good results in scanning films/slides
    • I never did break it, and the results are great, Copying negatives was easier and faster as the negatives could just be fed through, one strip at a time as opposed to one slide at a time
    • If you have a small air pump (like the kind to pump up a beach ball) or canned air, you can use that instead with better results
    • You have to line up each photo individually and very precisely to get the best result
    • Even if you do not enhance them with a photo edit, the results are good.
    • Although the image was acceptable for the Wolverine converted negatives it was necessary in most cases to adjust the white balance in Gimp, however, this was easily automated and produced great results
    • My Dad had some great pictures from my childhood locked up in a pile of 35mm slides, so I ordered the Wolverine to give me a hand digitizing them, and the results were excellent
    • The Wolverine has built-in software for making adjustments to the image (you can raise or lower the exposure value and change the color temperature, for example) but after a few experiments I decided that for the most part it was easier (and produced better results) to make these adjustments later, using PhotoShop, or similar software on the computer
    • If you run the picture thru Adobe Photoshop, you have some miraculous results
    • The resulting pictures may not stand up to a blow up for poster size but were great results for decent digital formats to share with family around the world and see some of the past.
    • I'm no photographer or professional studio editor, but the results from 35mm negatives and slides are amazing
    • So far I have converted a number of old 35mm slides and the digital results show well on the computer.
    • Clear, detailed resulting JPEGs
    • and I must say, the results are far better than using my flatbed HP Officejet Scanner (only maxes out at 600dpi)
    • The results look like out of focus; the resolution, despite so called 20MP, is very bad
    • If it makes that job go super fast with favorable results I will update my comments
    • This is the one to get for good results without breaking the bank.
    • Tedious process with poor quality results
    • Easy to use and give good results.
    • I would keep the best result and delete the others later in iPhoto
    • little awkward but got good results
    • Easy to use and have had excellent results with both slides and negatives.
    • The results were not bad but were not as high resolution as with the flatbed
    • Horrible results.
    • The result is much better than both scans even though the LX3 is only a 10mp camera.
    • It is very easy to use and the results are GREAT!
    • The result is very satisfying.
    • When the slides quality is good the result is good and vice versa
    • DSLR negative scanning (check youtube) produces much better quality results although requires a decent amount of processing
    • This is an easy-to-use device, small in size, but almost foolproof, that gives clearly acceptable results for most users
    • For a toy's price, can't beat the convenience and the satisfactory results form this yellow box
    • I have been looking and trying several products but nothing provided satisfactory results until I found this.
    • Easy to use and nice results.
    • It is easy to use, and its results are very good, and we have more than a thousand 2 x 2 slides to go through.
    • Very simple to use and give wonderful results.
    • And perhaps those who say this unit produced blurry, unacceptable results got a defective one of these
    • The colors are way off and require substantial color correction, which is time consuming, often inadequate and does not produce good results (see below).3
    • Have been scanning family slides with good results, although not excellent
    • Even with multiple attempts, the adjustments do not work well, and the resulting digital images look lousy, even after adjustments via Photoshop.
    • I run mine in auto mode which gives me excellent results in just seconds per slide