• Reviews around scanner (3.56 of 5)

    Wolverine F2D Super 20MP 4-In-1 Film to Digital Converter

    • Bought this piece, tried it out for a day, and returned it for a better scanner
    • It's a tiny flaw in an otherwise great scanner.
    • Lastly, If you are like me and print full frame, you will definitely not like this scanner
    • I've been looking for a decent slide scanner for some time
    • I've wanted a slide/negative scanner for a while now, and figured I'd start at the lower price end with this one, given its high ratings.
    • If you want perfect pictures, you need to carefully clean each slide first, and use a top end scanner, or a professional service
    • The scanner sets up easily and the slide/negative holders work just fine
    • It's so nice to get to scan old photos from my family that I haven't seen in years and this scanner is compact and reliable.
    • I have to say I didn't expect a whole lot from such an inexpensive negative "scanner"
    • Granted the time to scan photos using the wolverine is much faster that using a flat top scanner, the quality is very poor in comparison.
    • The process goes like this: first, you place the 8mm guide in the negative scanner tray, then feed the film through, then line up each individual frame and take a scan.
    • Can anyone suggest a good quality affordable scanner that will do what this product advertises
    • This scanner works as described and is a good price.
    • Everything you need to get your slides into the computer is included (the thing even has built in memory should you not have an extra memory card).I fully recommend this product if you want a solid slide scanner without a lot of unnecessary bells and whistles.
    • I absolutely LOVE this scanner.
    • Save up and get a better scanner.
    • This is a great scanner with a big output for the average person that needs to convert slides or negatives into a digital format.
    • This scanner works really well
    • Wolverine is a good scanner, but only a few menu settings and the display is a fixed one
    • This scanner made short work of 12 carousels of family slides!
    • The second scanner works as advertised, although both seem to be cheaply made
    • This is the third and by far the best film scanner I've purchased over the years
    • This worked MUCH faster than what I've used in the past- a flatbed scanner with a transparency adapter
    • It seems to, that no cheap slide/film scanner, that works as a camera, essentially, can produce good results in scanning films/slides
    • This is an easy-to-use, quick scanner for 35mm film.
    • Great scanner for transparent slides
    • I am now moving towards the Epson flatbed photo scanners V600, V800 since these allow much better quality and the scanners can also scan multiple slides/negatives, photo prints (like my fading Wedding photos) and documents so it will provide much more functionality even though it is more money.
    • This scanner is very easy to use and gives excellent results.
    • As many reviewers noted, the scanner is super easy to set up, the interface is quite intuitive and scanning entire roll of film takes no more than couple of minutes
    • I recommend instead a full-sized scanner.
    • If you are a little more demanding of quality in a negative scanner, this is not the product for you.
    • So far, I have used this scanner to convert a couple of hundred old color slides and have found it to be a good scanner.
    • I had a more expensive Minolta Dimage scanner, that got lost in a move, so wanting to get rid of hundreds of slides and
    • The scanner's viewfinder fails to accurately show your color-correction and/or exposure settings
    • This negative and film scanner does a good job of creating surprisingly large scans of negatives and slides.
    • For its size and price it's a great film scanner
    • This past weekend I had the opportunity to use a much more expensive ($1000+) slide scanner which took nearly 30 minutes just to scan ten slides, which still needed to be sorted, named, etc
    • This is a great little film scanner for the money
    • This scanner is better than none at all, and might satisfy your needs if your slides are properly exposed, normal images
    • I tried this inexpensive scanner to scan some 15-20 year old negatives that I have had stored and didn't want to ship via mail to a scanning service out of state (or even India)
    • I purchased this $100.00 Wolverine F2D scanner to replace an expensive ($469.00) Epson photo scanner, and I think it is far superior.
    • Scanner is easy to use and works great; have been able to do over 2,000 negative frames in about 40 hours (evenings while watching TV).
    • although the scanner feels like a toy and very cheaply
    • I used this digital negative scanner to scan in about 2 decades of negatives
    • I have to say I didn't expect a whole lot from such an inexpensive negative "scanner"
    • However, it is not a good scanner for slides
    • But on certain negatives, the scanner completely looses it
    • In turn you spend quite a bit of time cleaning the scanner with the brush that is included
    • Overall, I would recommend this scanner for anyone with a lot of old slides.
    • I really wanted this scanner to work well enough for me
    • After I discovered that my flatbed scanner was basically useless at converting color slides into jpegs, I looked around for a dedicated alternative
    • This is an amazing scanner
    • The wolverine F2D Super 20 MP film scanner is a Godsend for my old negatives & slides
    • Prefer the loading tray simplicity to those of more complex scanner trays.
    • I had great hopes for this litte machine, after searching for a dedicated 35mm negative scanner.
    • Overall this is a good digital scanner.
    • All in all a Fantastic scanner for the price!!
    • The Epson produces better colors, but the canon is a faster scanner.
    • One excellent slide scanner!!It's fast and with the capability of correcting color and exposure before you scan
    • but that is part of the slide jumble and not the scanner's limitation
    • But so far, I like this little scanner a lot
    • The time it's going to cost you to fix each negative scanned with the wolverine, it would be faster to scan the developed photo on a quality flat top scanner
    • My wife uses this scanner and she loves it
    • Easy to UseBesides the fact that the interface is terrible, the scanner is easy to use - whether you choose to hook it up to your computer or use it as a standalone, it's pretty fool proof.
    • I dont have the time for the 20 - 60 seconds per slide more expensive scanners
    • This is an mediocre at best scanner
    • Quick and easy slide/negative scanner
    • ’s 20 slides).Make sure there aren’t any particles or specks of dust or lint inside of the machine and on the scanning lens as well as on your slides or they will show up on every slide scanned
    • It really works as it says it does!!
    • The first one I tried was not great and reinforced my concern but decided to keep on going as I had hundreds of slides, so after a few I saw some were as clear as if they had been taken today with a digital camera.
    • The images produced by the Wolverine were every bit as good as those turned out by the Nikon