-
I'm reading too much of these 'It's still good' reviews which just encourages industry to release buggy half-a**ed products like this
-
If this game was a $20 add-on to Arkham City, I probably would have given it a better review
-
heck, Destructoid gave it a 3.5 in a long, albeit spiteful review
-
There have been some unkind reviews for this game and other, more accurate, reviews about some bugs / glitches
-
I read some mediocre reviews of this game and have to say
-
I've seen some some what negative reviews of this game because they complain about this game being the same
-
Don't let negative reviews stop you from playing a very enjoyable game.
-
I recommend waiting for the developers to stop tweeting only their good reviews and eventually release a patch that fixes these game breaking glitches or buying it preowned or reduced
-
Do not let the overly negative reviews from gaming sites around the net scare you
-
There have been some unkind reviews for this game and other, more accurate, reviews about some bugs / glitches
-
Nobody is going to be interested a lengthy review from
-
Rating: 9.5/10For another accurate review, check out Heath T. Holland's from a day or two back--right on the money.
-
After reading all the harsh reviews, I was pretty skeptical on picking up the first Arkham game without Rockstead at the creation table
-
This game is now the reason why I will never again pre-order or buy a game upon release date, I will wait for reviews and bug/damage reports
-
Although Arkham Origins had some doubts swirling around it due to the new developers and some mixed/negative reviews after it's release, in my opinion it turns out to be just as good or better than the previous games in many areas
-
Do not, I repeat, do not believe any negative reviews you see for this game as far as fun factor and story go