editorsVery low resolution and inconsistent exposure causes a poor quality pulsing time lapse

Poor quality images.

On "Best" quality the disk space used per frame (400KB/frame on a complex well-lit image for 720p images) is on par with a 95% or so quality JPEG, but somehow they still seem to have lots of artifacts, perhaps because not all JPEG encoders are equal

quality affordable options :)Keep up the good work.

Images are nice quality but can be blurry at a slow shutter speed.

Images are nice quality but can be blurry at a slow shutter speed.

Overall good quality

The quality is unmatched because of the freedom and quality of accessories available

The camera is wonderful for capturing events with outstanding quality even in low light conditions.

The battery life is very long, so if you don't mind the poor quality, you can get time lapse footage over many hours or days.

I really wanted to like this thing, but the quality is so poor that I'm switching back to my GoPro solution and manually building time lapse videos from still images.

Among the improvements:First and most important, greatly improved picture quality, especially in high-contrast and low-light shots

No editing!This has several add-ons you can buy which includes a waterproof case, additional lens for even better quality and focus

Yes, very good quality video

While time is a small price to pay for such great quality, it's still a factor for some who just want to get it on Facebook

The quality of the processed video exceeds my expectations.

Quality of pics is not as good as on ads clips, but still very good