COD4 is an incredible accomplishment but that does not mean World at War should be rated at one or two stars becuz it doesn't fully measure up

The maps are excellent and the combat is violent and furious ... weapons choice, game mode, challenges and perks are as good, if not better that CoD4.

COD4 was the greatest, The latest cod4 patch made you turn off punkbuster when hosting/playing with same key but still worked

So to sum up, this game is a good sequel to COD4, since COD4 was getting tiresome.

It is no where near as good a COD4.

I liked COD4, but the modern setting was kind of annoying to me.

I still prefer CoD4 in general even though it is an older game; it just plays smoother

The impression I'm left with is that CoD4 was better for the following reasons:1

COD4 was the greatest, The latest cod4 patch made you turn off punkbuster when hosting/playing with same key but still worked

COD4 was the greatest, The latest cod4 patch made you turn off punkbuster when hosting/playing with same key but still worked

COD4 was the greatest, The latest cod4 patch made you turn off punkbuster when hosting/playing with same key but still worked

They play Far Cry 2 and Left 4 Dead great as well as COD4 at max settings

If you like COD4, but would rather play with WWII weapons, I highly recommend COD

The gritty and brutal WW2 battlefield + the nifty and flexible COD4 perks system = should be great

All past COD's are excellent, including the popular COD4

The excitement I got when I first opened COD4 was exhilerating, but not this time

COD4 was the greatest, The latest cod4 patch made you turn off punkbuster when hosting/playing with same key but still worked

WaW is not as good as cod4, which is a great game experience, but I wasn't disappointed in this game

This game sucks D, don't even bother with it