The Dell is better for gaming simply because of the lesser input lag and the Asus is better for accurate photography editing because of it's pre-calibration from the factory, although you can calibrate the Dell as well if you have the hardware

( I didn't see a difference in input lag between this and my previous 2ms response time TN

Apparently input lag is not a statistic that is advertised

The input lag is acceptably low for a 60Hz panel (under 1 frame, so you should never notice an input delay).Cons:This model does not support Adobe RGB color space; this is only a concern for seriously hardcore professional artists

Performance:Even from people who professed their love for the 2413, I kept reading about ghosting problems, about cyan color trails and input lag and 'gaming modes', and other things which sounded either

Also I'd like to add that the input lag is minimal and I was able to play FPS games with no ill effect

At any rate, while the Dell U2412M may have a higher response time than the Asus (as a negligible difference), the Asus has more input lag

Input lag: I cloned both displays and started a timer which tests input lag and took a photo with a DSLR camera of both screens, and the Dell was clearly faster

Conclusion: out of the better-packaged box, the Asus PA248Q offers a higher quality display in terms of colors and a more uniform IPS glow, at the expense of more input lag than the Dell

However, I am now returning the Asus PA248Q mainly because I discovered that it has more input lag than the Dell

and they were equal with input lag

Returning them and getting the correct U replacements was straightforward, although cumbersome (this was an order of 14 monitors, so could have been worse).

I t was fine

Especially plain white surfaces, like web pages, would shimmer a

The anti-glare surface is like the other Dell AG screens I've seen - and to my eyes, works as it should - I don't have to dim the lights to see what I want to see.

However, the picture is really not as sharp as I would think "Ultra Sharp" indicates, although I suppose you get what you pay for

It's not quite as sharp as I had hoped for (noticeable with smaller fonts) but good value considering the reasonable price.

I've had several LCD monitors in the past at home as well as at work

Not as accurate as an EIZO as it's been compared to, but very close and a much better value for most applications in a design, retouching, or prepress environment

Also excellent for gaming as well as for productivity purposes just overall great monitor.

Mine isn't as bad as

I've owned several Dell UltraSharp displays and found them to be nearly as good as my Apple Cinema Displays, if not just as good

Rather than price, I was more bothered with second cons as I needed a single computer in home as well as in school with all required softwares for my academic work which I might need to access anytime