In fact, I'm convinced talking about good graphics in the year 2006 is pretty pointless

Yes, it's true that back in the PS One days we put the games with exceptional graphics on a different level from the other games, but we did NOT criticize the graphically-average games JUST because graphically-superior games were available at the time

We didn't go into each game with the mindset that each game had to have "incredible graphics", we went into each game just expecting to have fun

Hours of fun, great graphics, one of the best action games in my opinion

I don't think I would play any of the PS3 games, the PS2 games are cheaper and more entertaining than fancy graphics

Yes, it will be the same people who once praised the graphics, too

When a game with incredible graphics came along, such as Resident Evil 2 and Final Fantasy 7, we treated them with open arms just like we did with other games

Today, with the Playstation 2, people are so concerned with only great graphics that many times the gameplay suffers as a result

Very solid unit, and one to buy if you want to have great graphics without the price shock of the PS3 and X-box 360.

We treated games with good graphics and below-average graphics equally *as long as* the average or bad-looking games offered enjoyable replay value

The PS1 wasn't created for the sole purpose of dazzling gamers with amazing graphics