It's basically the same pixel density as you get with 1920x1080 but more screen real estate, so you don't have to worry about scaling issues as you do w/ 4k monitors

I hope these reviewers are not confusing text scaling issues with grain, though that

I'm currently running Windows Technical Preview (Windows 10).Text and icons overall look much more correct and crisp on the S32, whereas on the U32 they suffer from 4K scaling issues, or at least I guess that's what it is

The only way I can see the U32D970Q being worth anything close to what it costs, is if you do a lot of Photoshop work on highly detailed images and really want/need the subtle textural advantage provided by having 2.25 times more pixels, and aren't bothered by some minor ghosting and text/UI scaling issues (at least until the latter can be fixed).It makes me curious to see what Apple's new 5K iMac looks like in person

Of course at 1440p the display scaling issues are not anywhere near as dramatic as 4k or 8k, but they still do exists and it is sometimes still an issue

The stand is absolutely gorgeous, and is as much of a pleasure to manipulate as it is to stare at on top of your desk

The color is not as rich as on the

It's obvious there is either a cable/shielding issue, voltage/line noise issue, or else the monitor is defective."Sharp as a

The "worst" of the reviews claimed delta e of 2.0, which is indistinguishable to the eye (though the IPS they compared it to was 0.4).

The "worst" of the reviews claimed delta e of 2.0, which is indistinguishable to the eye (though the IPS they compared it to was 0.4).